ACCC takes action against Coverall Cleaning alleging ‘unconscionable conduct’

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has instituted proceedings against Coverall Cleaning Concepts South East Melbourne Pty Ltd (Coverall Melbourne) in a 21 July press release alleging that it engaged in 'unconscionable conduct in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL)'.
Michael Schaper
Michael Schaper

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has instituted proceedings against Coverall Cleaning Concepts South East Melbourne Pty Ltd (Coverall Melbourne). According to a 21 July press release, ACCC is alleging that Coverall Melbourne engaged in ‘unconscionable conduct in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL)’.

The ACCC also alleges that Coverall Melbourne made false or misleading representations, engaged in conduct that was misleading or likely to mislead, and contravened the Franchising Code of Conduct.

‘The ACCC alleges from August 2013 Coverall Melbourne represented to two franchisees that they would receive a volume of work that would enable them to earn specified amounts and that they would receive payment of those amounts each month,’ stated the release. However, the ACCC alleges Coverall Melbourne ‘did not have reasonable grounds for making the representations and failed to make the payments as represented and on the terms required by Coverall Melbourne’s franchise agreements.’

Further, it is alleged that Coverall Melbourne failed to comply with requirements of the Franchising Code of Conduct, by ‘not having reasonable grounds for the earnings information provided to the two franchisees in contravention of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA)’.

The ACCC alleges that Coverall Melbourne’s failure to make payments to the franchisees, as well as other alleged conduct, was ‘unconscionable, particularly as the franchisees had significantly weaker bargaining power than Coverall Melbourne,’ claimed the release.

“Unconscionable conduct affecting small business is a priority area for the ACCC,” said ACCC deputy chair Dr Michael Schaper. “The ACCC will not hesitate to take court action to enforce compliance with laws that are specifically designed to protect small business from unfair practices.

“Micro-sized firms, franchisees and self-employed individuals should not be treated in a manner which goes beyond the bounds of commercially-acceptable practice, or which is more than just hard bargaining,” Dr Schaper said.

‘The ACCC has joined Coverall Melbourne’s sole director, Brett Jones, and sales manager, Astrid Haley, to the proceedings. The ACCC alleges they aided and abetted and were knowingly concerned in Coverall Melbourne’s alleged contraventions of the ACL and CCA,’ stated the release.

The ACCC is seeking pecuniary penalties, injunctions (including an interlocutory injunction), and compensation for the two affected franchisees, and costs.

www.accc.gov.au

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required