FWO secures interim freeze order over Sydney-based cleaning company

The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) says it has taken the rare step of securing an interim Court Order freezing company assets after commencing legal proceedings against a cleaning company for allegedly underpaying employees more than $300,000.
Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James
Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James

The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) says it has taken the rare step of securing an interim Court Order freezing company assets after commencing legal proceedings against a cleaning company for allegedly underpaying employees more than $300,000.

According to its 2 September press release, the FWO commenced proceedings in the Federal Court in July against Sydney-based cleaning company Grouped Property Services Pty Ltd.

Also facing Court are Grouped Property Services’ former owner and sole director Rosario Pucci and his brother Enrico Pucci, the company’s current owner and sole director.

The FWO is seeking penalties against all respondents for various alleged contraventions, including $308,000 in underpayments of 51 workers and breaches of adverse action and sham contracting laws.

The Agency is also seeking Court Orders requiring Grouped Property Services to rectify the alleged underpayments in full.

After commencing proceedings, the FWO sought and secured interim Federal Court Orders restricting the operators of Grouped Property Services from dispersing the company’s assets up to the value of the alleged underpayments.

Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James explained that the Orders aimed to prevent the company from being stripped of assets or placed into liquidation, which would frustrate any back-payment orders against the company.

“We have received more than 200 complaints against Grouped Property Services and associated companies over a number of years and we are concerned that the company’s alleged business practices have led to employees being denied their lawful minimum entitlements,” James revealed.

“We are committed to doing everything within our power to ensure the workers involved in this case receive their lawful entitlements and that the respondents are held liable for what we allege are serious breaches of workplace laws.”

The 51 allegedly underpaid workers include migrant workers from non-English speaking backgrounds and some international students.
Most were engaged as cleaners, but some worked in clerical and other roles.

The FWO alleges Grouped Property Services, Rosario Pucci and Enrico Pucci purported to outsource the employment of the workers to labour-hire company National Contractors Pty Ltd.

‘It is alleged that the labour hire arrangement was not genuine.

‘National Contractors – which allegedly did not own any real property, generated little or no income or operated at a loss and was registered at Grouped Property Services’ business address – was allegedly actually controlled by Grouped Property Services.

‘It is alleged the true employer of the workers was Grouped Property Services for reasons including the direction and control the company had over the workers’ duties.

‘It is alleged that three other purported labour hire companies which had formerly also been registered at the Grouped Property Services business address had previously gone into liquidation, leaving little or nothing in the way of assets that could be used to pay former employees,’ the FWO stated.

In one of those cases, the FWO secured $4400 in Court-issued fines against Rosario Pucci for his involvement in underpaying three employees – but Pucci’s company Wash and Go Pty Ltd was placed into liquidation, preventing the Fair Work Ombudsman from securing penalties against it (refer www.fairwork.gov.au/About-us/news-and-media-releases/2011-media-releases/December-2011/20111219-pucci-penalty).

James noted that the Agency has taken the additional step of seeking a freezing Order because of this alleged pattern of behaviour.

She added that the involvement of workers from non-English speaking backgrounds was also an aggravating feature of the matter.

“These workers can be vulnerable if they are not fully aware of their rights or are reluctant to complain, so we treat such cases very seriously,” she emphasised.

Grouped Property Services faces maximum penalties of up to $51,000 per breach, while Rosario and Enrico Pucci each face maximum penalties of up to $10,200 per breach.

A directions hearing is listed for the matter in the Federal Court in Sydney on September 12.

www.fairwork.gov.au

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required

Advertisement
Advertisement